AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT evaluate: An excellent GPU at a nasty worth | Job Alls


The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT goals to supply a less expensive solution to get on the RDNA 3 graphics prepare. This mannequin has the identical specs as its dearer sibling and gives vital efficiency enhancements over its predecessor, together with extra highly effective RT cores. Sadly, there would not appear to be any motive to decide on this explicit pixel pusher over options from the Radeon RX 7000 lineup and competing choices.

It pains me to say it, but when the Radeon 7900 XT is something to go by, we’ll have to attend some time longer to see AMD pull off a Ryzen-style disruption to its rivals within the race for the most effective graphics card crown. That is to not say it is a unhealthy package, nevertheless it’s on no account compelling for its worth.

To AMD’s credit score, I’ve spent the previous month driving the RX 7900 XT day by day, and it is confirmed to be a dependable and funky companion throughout the number of video games I’ve used it for. Whether or not we’re speaking about driver stability, noise ranges or temperature, it has been something however clean.

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT display inputs

Specs

A have a look at the RX 7900 XT’s specs reveals that this pixel pusher is definitely a scaled-down model of its dearer sibling. It makes use of the identical GPU because the Navi 31, however packs 2nd era RT stream processors, compute models, and cores along with decrease clock speeds. Whereas the XT makes use of the identical GDDR6 VRAM, it makes use of much less of it, and its reminiscence bus width and clocks lag behind the RX 7900 XTX.

RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XTX RX 6900 XT
GPU Navi 31 (RDNA 3) Navi 31 (RDNA 3) Navi 21 (RDNA 2)
Stream processors 5,376 6,144 5,120
Computing models 84 96 80
RT cores 84 (second era) 96 (second era) 84 (first era)
Base clock 1385 MHz 1900 MHz 1815 MHz
recreation time 2025 MHz 2300 MHz 2015 MHz
Strengthen the clock 2395 MHz 2500 MHz 2250 MHz
VRAM 20 GB GDDR6 24 GDDR6 16 GB GDDR6
bus width 320 bits 384 bit 256 bit
TBP 315 watts 355 watts 300 watts
MSRP/RRP US$899 / £899 US$999 / £999 US$999 / £999

All of those reductions imply that not less than it makes use of much less energy, however you continue to must pair it with a premium energy provide. Its 315W TBP places the RX 7900 XT simply 5W behind the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 and should not be paired with something lower than a 750W PSU. Nonetheless, there isn’t any must fork out for an ATX 3.0 PSU or undergo the effort of a ineffective dongle, because it makes use of the tried and examined twin 8-pin connectors as an alternative of the 16-pin plug you will discover on the RTX 4000 graphics. . Playing cards

AMD made a giant track and dance concerning the inclusion of DisplayPort 2.1 inputs on its Radeon RX 7000 collection playing cards at its launch occasion, and you will find two on the 7900 XT alongside a USB Sort-C port and HDMI 2.1. This could theoretically make the GPU able to supporting 4K shows with refresh charges as much as 480Hz and even 8K shows at 165Hz.

I say theoretically as a result of the cardboard is just not able to reaching these limits in most video games, even with AMD FSR. This enchancment is welcome from a future proofing perspective, however I’d have most well-liked to see two HDMI 2.1 ports and one DP 2.1, as the previous is extra helpful within the right here and now.

The RX 7900 XT is a well-equipped card that gives a number of upgrades over its predecessor, nevertheless it’s arduous to disregard how shut the specs are to the RX 7900 XTX, with solely $100 between them. Usually, a less expensive card ought to supply higher worth, however I am going to should spend a while with the 7900 XTX to make sure.

Side view of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT showing its heatsink

Plan

For these anxious that the RX 7900 XT is simply one other addition to the rising ranks of graphics card giants that began with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090, they’ll breathe a sigh of reduction. AMD’s two-slot reference design is an affordable dimension and will match into most ATX PC circumstances, and I feel it is a good addition to any construct because of its largely muted, nearly industrial design.

AMD leans extra in direction of the darkish facet with its 7900 XT colour scheme, which is similar to the up to date lineup of 6000 collection playing cards we noticed final yr. Look carefully, nonetheless, and you will see that the “R” that after occupied the middle of every of the three followers has been changed by a extra minimal design.

There’s a hint of RGB on the 7900 XT which fits me simply fantastic. The one colour you see is a crimson stripe alongside the warmth sink and on the again panel. In fact, every part I described solely applies to the reference design, so you may get your LED repair with companion boards. Simply take into account that their coolers will probably be a lot bigger, approaching the scale of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and 4080.

Personally, the RTX 4000 Founders Version fashions nonetheless rank first by way of appears, however the 7900 XT is not far behind. I simply want each AMD and Nvidia had launched white variations of their reference designs earlier (come on, guys).

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Backplane

Efficiency

To place the RX 7900 XT via its paces, I ran all of my benchmarks at native 4K decision, aside from the Cyberpunk 2077 run, which makes use of AMD FSR.

Listed below are the specs of our take a look at system:

  • Working system: Home windows 11 Professional (22621.1105)
  • GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
  • Motherboard: Asus TUF Gaming X670E-Plus
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
  • RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5 6000 MHz
  • SSD: SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
  • PSU: Corsair HX1200i

Even at 4K, the 7900 XT can crank out fairly vital body charges. Its finest performer in our take a look at suite is undoubtedly the F1 22, with the GPU delivering a mean body price of 188fps. Hitman 3 and Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy additionally see triple-digit efficiency numbers, whereas Cyberpunk 2077 is not far behind at 97fps (albeit with the assistance of AMD FSR to spice up every part).

Issues get a bit harder when taking a look at Tiny Tina’s Wonderland and Complete Struggle: Warhammer 3. The Borderlands spin-off runs at a mean of 70fps, however the minimal framerate barely manages it across the 60fps line. In the meantime, the RTS recreation places the RDNA 3 down by 46fps, with a mean of 62fps.

We do not at present have the XTX 7900 to check it to. Nonetheless, we are able to evaluate these outcomes with the principle rivals of the 7900 XT: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti. In video games the place the Radeon shines the brightest, it principally matches 80-class GPUs and might even beat it in some eventualities like Hitman 3. At instances, it feels extra just like the cheaper RTX 4070 Ti in video games like Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands. Defeated in Complete Struggle: Warhammer 3.

Sadly, any wind the 7900 XT might have had in its figurative sails in opposition to Nvidia’s choices is shortly eliminated by DLSS 3 Body Technology. AMD has introduced a competitor for this know-how, however for now, its absence leaves Radeon firmly within the lead in video games that help Tim Inexperienced’s body price wizardry – and that listing will solely proceed to develop.

Worse, the 7900 XT’s ray-tracing efficiency merely cannot sustain with any current-generation GPU out of inexperienced. Regardless of the elevated capabilities of the second-gen RT cores, AMD’s card sits someplace between the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 and the RTX 4070 Ti.

In each benchmark we ran, the 7900 XT fell behind the most affordable RTX 4000 obtainable immediately, with this efficiency hole naturally growing with the arrival of DLSS 3 Body Technology. This appears even worse when you think about that Radeon GPUs begin at $899, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti could be had for barely greater than its $799 MSRP, with companion fashions beginning at $829. have.

To be clear, the efficiency provided by the 7900 XT is spectacular sooner or later, however AMD nonetheless has a solution to go to meet up with Nvidia on the subject of ray tracing. Here is hoping AMD FSR 3 may also help bridge the hole when it arrives, however for now, it appears like Crew Crimson is caught taking part in second fiddle.

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT on a white surface

Sentence

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has many qualities worthy of graphics card, however taking a look at it within the wider context of its rivals and siblings, it is arduous to justify its worth. At $899, you are in all probability higher off shopping for the RTX 4070 Ti or paying an additional $100 for the RX 7900 XTX. Suffice it to say, this GPU is begging for a worth drop.

We might see this narrative change as soon as AMD FSR 3 arrived, and the crimson workforce is well-known at this level for enhancing the efficiency of their GPUs over time by way of driver updates. Nobody can purchase something primarily based on hypothesis or guarantees, and the 7900 XT is not any exception.

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Sturdy raster efficiency is not sufficient to make up for this GPU’s shortcomings, together with the dearth of ray-tracing body charges and unresponsiveness to DLSS 3 Body Technology.

6



Supply hyperlink